| ID | JOS-2470-1009.149 |
| 著者：名前 | |
| 著者：別形式 | Araki, Junichi / Inoue, Yutaka / Honda, Lina / Morita, Shiho / Tsuchiya, Munechika / Ueno, Taku / Kanamoto, Ikuo |
| 著者：カナ | |
| 著者：所属 | IMS富士見総合病院薬剤部 / 城西大学薬学部医薬品安全性学研究室 / 城西大学薬学部医薬品安全性学研究室 / 城西大学薬学部医薬品安全性学研究室 / IMS富士見総合病院栄養科 / IMS富士見総合病院薬剤部 / 城西大学薬学部医薬品安全性学研究室 |
| 著者：所属(別形式） | IMS Fujimi General Hospital, Department of Pharmacy / Josai University, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory of Drug Safety Management / Josai University, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory of Drug Safety Management / Josai University, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory of Drug Safety Management / IMS Fujimi General Hospital, Department of Nutrition / IMS Fujimi General Hospital, Department of Pharmacy / Josai University, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory of Drug Safety Management |
| 著者版フラグ | publisher |
| 出版地 | CA |
| 出版者 | Sci Forschen |
| 電子ISSN | 24701009 |
| 掲載誌名 | |
| 巻 | 6 |
| 号 | 1 |
| 刊行年月 | 2020-01 |
| 開始ページ | 1 |
| 終了ページ | 8 |
| コンテンツ作成日 | 2019-12-05 |
| コンテンツ修正日 | 2019-12-24 |
| コンテンツ登録日 | 2020-03-21 |
| 識別番号：DOI | info:doi/10.16966/2470-1009.149 |
| 識別番号：DOI（リンク） | |
| 抄録 | Background and Aims: This study aimed to determine how nutritional endpoints affected nutritional risk assessment. We conducted nutritional screening using 3 different tools, namely, the modified SGA (mSGA), MUST, and Mini Nutritional Assessment® Short-Form (MNA®-SF). We compared the results of these nutritional evaluation tools and compared the parameters evaluated. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 1253 patients (mean age 71.0 ± 15.1 years) who had been admitted to the IMS Fujimi General Hospital from October to December 2017 (excluding pediatric admissions). Based on patient electronic medical records, nutritional status was determined using the abovementioned assessment tools. Additionally, we considered the parameters used in each evaluation tool and examined their use in determining nutritional status. Results: The mSGA, MUST, and MNA®-SF tools indicated that 15.1%, 31.4%, and 24.2% of patients were malnourished, respectively. Among the parameters affecting screening outcomes, assessing BMI was used in all tools. Moreover, pressure injury and mobility were found to be frequently used as evaluation parameters in the mSGA and the MNA®-SF, respectively. Compared with the mSGA, the MUST and the MNA®-SF evaluated the presence of malnutrition more frequently. Conclusions: BMI assessment affects the nutritional status of a patient and was an essential factor in nutritional assessment, based on the 3 tools employed in our study. The MNA®-SF appeared more readily usable for nutritional risk assessment because of smaller evaluation parameter numbers and being easier to apply than the mSGA. The MNA®-SF also included walking unaided as an evaluation parameter for nutritional status alongside diet and weight loss. |
| キーワード | |
| 注記 | 8p. Article number: 149, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
| 言語 | eng |
| 資源タイプ | text |
| ジャンル | |
| フォーマット | application/pdf |
| 権利 | Copyright © 2019 Araki J, et al. |
| このアイテムを表示する：本文(pdf) |  ( 399.1KB) ダウンロード回数： 回 |
| このアイテムを表示する：URI | |
